Re: Document DateStyle effect on jsonpath string()
От | David E. Wheeler |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Document DateStyle effect on jsonpath string() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5801E26B-E2AB-4BA3-8B69-EF8837389284@justatheory.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Document DateStyle effect on jsonpath string() (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Document DateStyle effect on jsonpath string()
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sep 11, 2024, at 11:11, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > What "let result be stringified" behavior are you thinking of, > exactly? AFAICS there's not sensitivity to timezone unless you > use the _tz variant, otherwise it just regurgitates the input. There is stringification of a time, date, or timestamp value, which has no TZ, but is still affected by DateStyle. Then thereis stringification of timetz or timestamptz, which can be created by the .time_tz() and .timstamp_tz() functions, andtherefore are impacted by both the DateStyle and TimeZone configs, even when not using the _tz variant: david=# set timezone = 'America/New_York'; SET david=# select jsonb_path_query('"2023-08-15 12:34:56-09"', '$.timestamp_tz().string()'); jsonb_path_query -------------------------- "2023-08-15 17:34:56-04" david=# set timezone = 'America/Los_Angeles'; SET david=# select jsonb_path_query('"2023-08-15 12:34:56-09"', '$.timestamp_tz().string()'); jsonb_path_query -------------------------- "2023-08-15 14:34:56-07" (1 row) > I agree that we should force ISO datestyle, but I'm not quite sure > about whether we're in the clear with timezone handling. We already > had a bunch of specialized rules about timezone handling in the _tz > and not-_tz variants of these functions. It seems to me that simply > forcing UTC would not be consistent with that pre-existing behavior. > However, I may not have absorbed enough caffeine yet. True, it would not be consistent with the existing behaviors, but I believe these are all new in Postgres 17. Best, David
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: