Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch
| От | Tom Lane | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5791.1281287684@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст | 
| Ответ на | Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) | 
| Ответы | Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands 
	patch Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch | 
| Список | pgsql-hackers | 
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
> updated patch attached
What exactly is the point of the \sf command?  It seems like quite a lot
of added code for a feature that nobody has requested, and whose
definition is about as ad-hoc as could be.  Personally I'd much sooner
use \ef for looking at a function definition.  I think if \sf had been
submitted as a separate patch, rather than being snuck in with a feature
people do want, it wouldn't be accepted.
The current patch doesn't even compile warning-free :-(
command.c: In function `exec_command':
command.c:559: warning: `lineno' might be used uninitialized in this function
command.c: In function `editFile':
command.c:1729: warning: `editor_lineno_switch' might be used uninitialized in this function
        regards, tom lane
		
	В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: