Re: Postgres vs. Redhat DB

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Postgres vs. Redhat DB
Дата
Msg-id 5785.1010556866@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Postgres vs. Redhat DB  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>)
Список pgsql-sql
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Hunter, Ray wrote:
>> 3. What is the difference between PostgreSQL and RedHat's version?

> Redhat's version runs on (and I believe has optimizations for?) Linux ...
> PgSQL runs on pretty much everything ...

Red Hat's version is not presently materially different from the
community PostgreSQL version.  In the future, the latest RH release
might be ahead of, behind, or different from the latest community
release at any given instant, due to vagaries of release cycles,
customer feature requests, or what have you.  But there is no intention
on either side (I fervently hope and believe) to cause a code fork
or long-term divergence.

Red Hat will provide commercial-grade support for PostgreSQL running on
RH Linux, and not for PG on any other system (AFAIK anyway).  But what
you're buying if you buy RHDB is that support, not a fundamentally
different product.
        regards, tom lane        Red Hat Database project


В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Resources
Следующее
От: "Michaell Oxtoby"
Дата:
Сообщение: Uisng Procedures via JDBC