Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andreas Karlsson
Тема Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions
Дата
Msg-id 574E14B2.6040306@proxel.se
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions
Список pgsql-hackers
On 05/31/2016 06:47 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Given that, your original approach of manually updating proargtypes in the
> existing pg_proc row for the functions may be the best way.  Anything else
> is going to be more complicated and ultimately will still require at least
> one direct catalog update.

It is the least ugly of all the ugly solutions I could think of. I have
attached a patch which fixes the signatures using this method. I use
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION to update to catcache. What do you think? Is
it too ugly?

Andreas

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: JSON[B] arrays are second-class citizens
Следующее
От: Peter van Hardenberg
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: JSON[B] arrays are second-class citizens