Re: Soon-to-be-broken regression test case

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Soon-to-be-broken regression test case
Дата
Msg-id 5749.1539276324@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Soon-to-be-broken regression test case  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: Soon-to-be-broken regression test case
Список pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2018-Oct-11, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I have been fooling around with a patch to allow pull-up of sub-selects
>> that lack any FROM, along the lines discussed in
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/15944.1521127664@sss.pgh.pa.us
>> I find that it is smart enough to reduce that EXISTS to a plain
>> expression, yielding
>> 
>>                     QUERY PLAN                     
>> ----------------------------------------------------
>> Subquery Scan on tenk1_vw_sec
>>   ->  Index Only Scan using tenk1_unique1 on tenk1
>>         Index Cond: (unique1 = 0)
>> (3 rows)

> Hmm, I have the feeling that this would nullify some tests in
> partition_prune also, which IIRC pretend to invoke runtime pruning with
> things like "WHERE partcol = (select 1)".

Hm, I'm not seeing any regression test result changes there.  However,
if you're just executing queries and not EXPLAIN'ing them, it's possible
something unwanted is happening under the hood.

            regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Soon-to-be-broken regression test case
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Soon-to-be-broken regression test case