Re: Declarative partitioning

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Langote
Тема Re: Declarative partitioning
Дата
Msg-id 5742D5F5.3020101@lab.ntt.co.jp
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Declarative partitioning  (Ildar Musin <i.musin@postgrespro.ru>)
Ответы Re: Declarative partitioning  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi Ildar,

On 2016/05/21 0:29, Ildar Musin wrote:
> On 20.05.2016 11:37, Amit Langote wrote:
>> Moreover, instead of pruning partitions in planner prep phase, might it
>> not be better to do that when considering paths for the (partitioned) rel?
>>   IOW, instead of looking at parse->jointree, we should rather be working
>> with rel->baserestrictinfo.  Although, that would require some revisions
>> to how append_rel_list, simple_rel_list, etc. are constructed and
>> manipulated in a given planner invocation.  Maybe it's time for that...
>> Again, you may have already considered these things.
>>
> Yes, you're right, this is how we did it in pg_pathman extension. But for
> this patch it requires further consideration and I'll do it in future!

OK, sure.

>> Could you try with the attached updated set of patches?  I changed
>> partition descriptor relcache code to eliminate excessive copying in
>> previous versions.

[...]

> However I've encountered a problem which is that postgres crashes
> occasionally while creating partitions. Here is function that reproduces
> this behaviour:
>
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION fail()
>  RETURNS void
>  LANGUAGE plpgsql
> AS $$
> BEGIN
> DROP TABLE IF EXISTS abc CASCADE;
> CREATE TABLE abc (id SERIAL NOT NULL, a INT, dt TIMESTAMP) PARTITION BY
> RANGE (a);
> CREATE INDEX ON abc (a);
> CREATE TABLE abc_0 PARTITION OF abc FOR VALUES START (0) END (1000);
> CREATE TABLE abc_1 PARTITION OF abc FOR VALUES START (1000) END (2000);
> END
> $$;
>
> SELECT fail();
>
> It happens not every time but quite often. It doesn't happen if I execute
> this commands one by one in psql. Backtrace:
>
> #0  range_overlaps_existing_partition (key=0x7f1097504410,
> range_spec=0x1d0f400, pdesc=0x1d32200, with=0x7ffe437ead00) at
> partition.c:747

[...]

I made a mistake in the last version of the patch which caused a relcache
field to be pfree'd unexpectedly.  Attached updated patches.

Thanks,
Amit

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: foreign table batch inserts
Следующее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertions on parallel worker shutdown