On 5/14/16 4:36 AM, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: To David Steele 2016-05-13 <20160513160737.GA6195@msg.df7cb.de>
>>> I'm pretty confused. The Packages file in the 9.6 repo is empty. Shouldn't
>>> that have the 9.6 version of libpq5?
>>
>> It should indeed have :(
>>
>> I'll see if building an updated postgresql-9.6 package (with some
>> unrelated copyright tweaks) fixes it.
>
> Sorry for the mess, I was at a customer on Thursday and had set up
> everything for automatic pushing. I was then notified of the problem
> while on the train in the evening, but couldn't do much until arriving
> at home, and at that point I was apparently just paying attention to
> the released branches, forgetting any problems the beta branch could
> have.
My builds are working now, thanks! I really appreciate you looking at
this on the weekend.
--
-David
david@pgmasters.net