Re: Simplifying our Trap/Assert infrastructure

On 27.10.22 09:23, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Agreed, even if extensions could use these, it looks like any
> out-of-core code using what's removed here would also gain in clarity.
> This is logically fine (except for an indentation blip in
> miscadmin.h?), so I have marked this entry as ready for committer.

committed

> Side note, rather unrelated to what's proposed here: would it be worth
> extending AssertPointerAlignment() for the frontend code?

Would there be a use for that?  It's currently only used in the atomics 
code.