Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0
| От | Joshua D. Drake |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5723ACDA.8080407@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0 (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy]
9.6 -> 10.0
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/29/2016 11:36 AM, Simon Riggs wrote: > Egos. > > Consider PgLogical, who is working on this outside of 2Q? > > > Thank you for volunteering to assist. What would you like to work on? You are very welcome. I have been testing as you know. I would be happy to continue that and also was going to look into having a subscriber validate if it is connecting to a subscribed node or not which is the error I ran into. I am also interested in creating user docs (versus reference docs). Sincerely, JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/ +1-503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: