Re: Fwd: Re: A new look at old NFS readdir() problems?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Fwd: Re: A new look at old NFS readdir() problems? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 572149.1735978551@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Fwd: Re: A new look at old NFS readdir() problems? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Fwd: Re: A new look at old NFS readdir() problems?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote:
> I wouldn't have any problem with saying that we don't support NFS
> implementations that don't have stable cookies. But so far I haven't
> found any supported platform except FreeBSD that fails the rmtree test
> against my Synology NAS.
To expand on that: I've now found that Linux, macOS, NetBSD, OpenBSD,
and illumos/OpenIndiana[1] pass that test. I don't believe that Windows
does NFS. That means that FreeBSD is the only one of our supported
platforms that fails. I think we should simply document that NFS on
FreeBSD is broken, and await somebody getting annoyed enough to
fix that brokenness.
regards, tom lane
[1] Getting OpenIndiana to work under qemu is not a task for those
easily discouraged.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: