Re: GIN data corruption bug(s) in 9.6devel

> This restricts the memory used by ordinary backends when doing the
> cleanup to be work_mem. Shouldn't we let them use
> maintenance_work_mem? Only one backend can be doing this clean up of a
> given index at any given time, so we don't need to worry about many
> concurrent allocations of maintenance_work_mem.  This seems very
> similar in spirit to index creation, where a backend is allowed to use
> maintenance_work_mem.
Because it could be a several indexes in one pg instance. And each cleaner could 
eat maintenance_work_mem.


>
> Also, do we plan on backpatching this?  While there are no known
Yes


-- 
Teodor Sigaev                                   E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru
  WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/