On 4/5/16 1:25 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Btw, those seem like small things to me, and my comments have been
> addressed, so I have switched the patch as ready for committer. I
> guess that Stephen would be the one to look at it.
I have also run this patch through my tests and didn't find any
problems. I agree that it is ready for committer.
I don't see a problem with using the top memory context but whoever
commits it may feel differently. I'm happy to leave that decision up to
them.
--
-David
david@pgmasters.net