Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication existing data copy

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Erik Rijkers
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication existing data copy
Дата
Msg-id 56f3ec6f1989c738a0fa865b13d25761@xs4all.nl
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication existing data copy  (Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2017-02-16 00:43, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> On 13/02/17 14:51, Erik Rijkers wrote:
>> On 2017-02-11 11:16, Erik Rijkers wrote:
>>> On 2017-02-08 23:25, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 0001-Use-asynchronous-connect-API-in-libpqwalreceiver-v2.patch
>>>> 0002-Always-initialize-stringinfo-buffers-in-walsender-v2.patch
>>>> 0003-Fix-after-trigger-execution-in-logical-replication-v2.patch
>>>> 0004-Add-RENAME-support-for-PUBLICATIONs-and-SUBSCRIPTION-v2.patch
>>>> 0001-Logical-replication-support-for-initial-data-copy-v4.patch
>>> 
>>> This often works but it also fails far too often (in my hands).  I
> 
> Could you periodically dump contents of the pg_subscription_rel on
> subscriber (ideally when dumping the md5 of the data) and attach that 
> as
> well?

I attach a bash script (and its output) that polls the 4 pgbench table's 
md5s and the pg_subscription_rel table, each second, while I run the 
pgbench_derail2.sh (for that see my earlier mail).

pgbench_derail2.sh writes a 'header' into the same output stream (search 
for '^===' ).

The .out file reflects a session where I started pgbench_derail2.sh 
twice (it removes the publication and subscription at startup).  So 
there are 2 headers in the attached  cb_20170216_10_04_47.out. The first 
run ended in a succesful replication (=all 4 pgbench tables 
md5-identical).  The second run does not end correctly: it has (one of) 
the typical faulty end-states: pgbench_accounts, the copy, has a few 
less rows than the master table.

Other typical endstates are:
same number of rows but content not identical (for some, typically < 20 
rows).
mostly pgbench_accounts and pgbench_history are affected.

(I see now that I made some mistakes in generating the timestamps in the 
.out file but I suppose it doesn't matter too much)

I hope it helps; let me know if I can do any other test(s).


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key
Следующее
От: Bernd Helmle
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] LWLock optimization for multicore Power machines