Re: [PROPOSAL] Client Log Output Filtering

On 3/29/16 12:28 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> David Steele wrote:
>>> On 3/29/16 10:18 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> Repurposing COMMERROR is definitely starting to seem like a low-impact
>>>> solution compared to these others.  Under what circumstances would you
>>>> be wanting hide-from-client with an elevel different from LOG, anyway?
>
>> So audit records would use COMMERROR?  That sounds really bad to me.
>
> My proposal would be to invent a new elevel macro, maybe LOG_ONLY,
> for this purpose.  But under the hood it'd be the same as COMMERROR.

My mistake, I see what you are getting at now.

-- 
-David
david@pgmasters.net