Re: Relation extension scalability
| От | Petr Jelinek |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Relation extension scalability |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 56E393B9.1070906@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Relation extension scalability (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Relation extension scalability
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/03/16 03:46, Dilip Kumar wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 5:31 AM, Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com > <mailto:Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com>> wrote: > > FWIW, this is definitely a real possibility in any shop that has > very high downtime costs and high transaction rates. > > I also think some kind of clamp is a good idea. It's not that > uncommon to run max_connections significantly higher than 100, so > the extension could be way larger than 16MB. In those cases this > patch could actually make things far worse as everyone backs up > waiting on the OS to extend many MB when all you actually needed > were a couple dozen more pages. > > > I agree, We can have some max limit on number of extra pages, What other > thinks ? > Well, that's what I meant with clamping originally. I don't know what is a good value though. -- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: