Re: Proposal: RETURNING primary_key()
| От | Igal @ Lucee.org |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Proposal: RETURNING primary_key() |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 56E05227.2060005@lucee.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Proposal: RETURNING primary_key() (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Proposal: RETURNING primary_key()
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/8/2016 5:12 PM, Craig Ringer wrote: > One of the worst problems (IMO) is in the driver architecture its > self. It attempts to prevent blocking by guestimating the server's > send buffer state and its recv buffer state, trying to stop them > filling and causing the server to block on writes. It should just > avoid blocking on its own send buffer, which it can control with > confidence. Or use some of Java's rather good concurrency/threading > features to simultaneously consume data from the receive buffer and > write to the send buffer when needed, like pgjdbc-ng does. Are there good reasons to use pgjdbc over pgjdbc-ng then?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: