Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker.

> On 2016/03/08 18:19, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
>> +              WHEN 0 THEN 100::numeric(5, 2)
>> +              ELSE ((S.param3 + 1)::numeric / S.param2 * 100)::numeric(5, 2)
>>
>> This usage of numeric seems overkill to me.
> 
> Hmm, how could this rather be written?

OK, agreed about the overkill. Following might be better:

+ WHEN 0 THEN round(100.0, 2)
+ ELSE round((S.param3 + 1) * 100.0 / S.param2, 2)

Will update that patch.

Thanks,
Amit