Re: a raft of parallelism-related bug fixes

On 2016/02/18 16:38, Craig Ringer wrote:
> I should resurrect Abhijit's patch to allow the isolationtester to talk to
> multiple servers. We'll want that when we're doing tests like "assert that
> this change isn't visible on the replica before it becomes visible on the
> master". (Well, except we violate that one with our funky
> synchronous_commit implementation...)

How much does (or does not) that overlap with the recovery test suite work
undertaken by Michael et al? I saw some talk of testing for patches in
works on the N synchronous standbys thread.

Thanks,
Amit