Re: BUG #13960: plpython fails with certain function names

On 2/16/16 7:49 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I like the idea of replacing invalid characters with '_'.  It's definitely
> not safe to scribble on the pg_proc tuple, but we could get the same
> result with a few wasted cycles by rescanning the procName string after
> building it, as per attached.

Heck, I didn't even think about that. Yeah, it's going to scan another
20 bytes or so, but this certainly isn't performance critical.

BTW, I didn't bother checking this with python 3.5, but I can't fathom
how that would matter here.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com