On 2/10/16 11:25 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
> Oh, and I suggest we call them SESSION variables rather than SCHEMA
> variables, to reinforce the idea of how long the values in the
> variables live. A session variable is in a sense a 1x1 temp table,
> whose definition persists across sessions but whose value does not.
>
>
> I didn't propose SESSION variables - now there are some workarounds how
> to anybody can emulate it, so this feature can wait. What we need is
> safe session variables with limited access. And the border can be
> defined by schema scope. So the keyword SCHEMA has sense, and it is
> necessary.
BTW, if all that's desired here are session variables for plpgsql, I
think it makes a lot more sense to start with implementing per-function
session variables. That's a lot simpler design-wise and is something we
should have anyway. You don't necessarily want session variables to be
schema-level. (I realize the other PLs make them global, which is even
worse, but that's no reason to continue that path.)
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com