Re: Multi-tenancy with RLS
| От | Joe Conway |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Multi-tenancy with RLS |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 56BA5C14.6050007@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Multi-tenancy with RLS (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Multi-tenancy with RLS
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 02/09/2016 01:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Maybe we need to restrict that somehow, or maybe some better solution > exists that we've not thought of yet. But in its current state, RLS > is at least as much a security hazard as it is a security aid. > I do not want to see it extended in ways that make pg_dump unsafe to > use. Ok, I can see that. Maybe we should have a specific GRANT for CREATE POLICY which is distinct from the privilege to CREATE TABLE? Joe -- Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: