On 2016/02/03 3:31, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>
>> Done. Attached is an updated version of the patch.
>
> Pushed, thanks.
Thank you!
> I kinda wonder why this struct member has a name that doesn't match the
> naming convention in the rest of the struct, and also why isn't it
> documented in the comment above the struct definition. But that's not
> this patch's fault.
I think so, too.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita