Re: invisible dependencies on a table?

Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@gmail.com> writes:
> Alright, just do my head does not explode, I am going to say the
> pg_describe_object() query is from a different run where you used table
> names foonew and fooold instead of foo1 and foo2?

Argh, sorry about that!  I decided old/new would be more useful names
in the middle of composing the example, and forgot to go back and fix
the creation commands in my text.

            regards, tom lane