Re: backend corruption
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: backend corruption |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5693.978826175@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: backend corruption ("Brett W. McCoy" <bmccoy@chapelperilous.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: backend corruption
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
"Brett W. McCoy" <bmccoy@chapelperilous.net> writes:
> On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, George Johnson wrote:
>> So basically, I've wiped all my databases, it looks like, and no, there is
>> no directory/structure which atomically can be called "your database", other
>> than the ENTIRE data/base directory.
> Sure there is -- under my $PGHOME/data/base, each separate database on my
> system is a sub-directory, which contain the system dictionaries, tables,
> indexes, etc.
Yeah, but those files are only half the truth. The other half lives in
pg_log and the installation-wide tables (pg_database, etc). George is
correct: you cannot recover using only the contents of $PGDATA/base/foo.
You really need all of $PGDATA.
I think that under 7.1, pg_log is not so critical anymore, but I'm not
sure. Vadim, any comment?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: