Re: Unique constraints and indexes.
| От | Steve Rogerson |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Unique constraints and indexes. |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 568C2145.5060709@yewtc.demon.co.uk обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Unique constraints and indexes. (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Unique constraints and indexes.
Re: Unique constraints and indexes. |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On 05/01/16 19:47, Tom Lane wrote: > Steve Rogerson <steve.pg@yewtc.demon.co.uk> writes: >> Is this a bug? I create a "unique" index, directly but it doesn't add a unique >> constraint. Add a unique constraint and it adds the index and the constraint. > > That's operating as designed. A unique constraint needs an index, > but not vice versa. I can see that might be plausible , hence the question but as a "unique index" imposes as constraint they seem equivalent. What's the functional difference between the two situations? Steve
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: