Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> I just noticed that this is leaking a bit of memory, because we call
> getObjectDescription (which pallocs its result) and then
> cstring_to_text which pallocs a copy. This is not a lot and it's not
> going to live much anyway, is it worrying about?
No. The extra string will go away at the end of the tuple cycle.
I don't think it's a particularly good idea for this code to assume
that getObjectDescription's result is freeable, anyway.
regards, tom lane