Simon Riggs wrote on 29/12/15 05:31:
[...]
> Thanks for testing.
>
> Do you have any comments on performance testing?
Not really, because I didn't have an equivalent environment to compare. These
tests took exactly the same time as another one with Postgresql 9.3, with a
major different in the setting of the server:
Postgresql 9.5 RC1
1 GB of RAM
1 vCPU Intel
CentOS 6.5
vs
Postgresql 9.3
8 GB of RAM
4 vCPU LPAR
Redhat 6.5 PowerLinux
So, I can't really compare. So, definitely no performance degradation, and
possible a performance gain. But of course, this could all be the fault of Alfresco.
Discussing with the Alfresco community I found a benchmarking test which I'm not
familiar with. I'll make sure to include that test next time I test a
pre-release version of Postgresql, and I'll make sure to have equivalent
environment to test.
> Are there any opportunities to improve Alfresco using the new features in
> PostgreSQL 9.5?
I'm not an Alfresco developer, but I'll try to contact the Alfresco engineers to
discuss this.
> Thanks
You're welcome and I hope next tests will include some performance measurements
a part from just compliance tests.
Cheers
Boriss
>
> --
> Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ <http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services