Re: FW: Patch for current_schemas to optionally include implicit

"Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> writes:
>> I believe I objected to that one... we need something like it=20
>> but Dave's first cut wasn't right.

> Second cut attached. This one just adds a boolean option to the existing
> function to indicate that implicit schemas are to be included (or not).
> I remembered the docs as well this time :-)

This looks good --- but Bruce, when you apply it don't forget to bump
catversion.h.

            regards, tom lane