Re: Datatypes and performance

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Maksim Likharev
Тема Re: Datatypes and performance
Дата
Msg-id 56510AAEF435D240958D1CE8C6B1770A014A0D84@mailc03.aurigin.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Datatypes and performance  ("Jay O'Connor" <joconnor@cybermesa.com>)
Ответы Re: Datatypes and performance  (Andrew Sullivan <andrew@libertyrms.info>)
Список pgsql-general
How postgres internally stores text fields, in a separate table?

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Sullivan [mailto:andrew@libertyrms.info]
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 12:55 PM
To: PostgreSQL List
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Datatypes and performance


On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 09:10:41AM -0700, Jay O'Connor wrote:
> Based on the docs, they say that there's not performance difference
between
> using varchar(n) and text.
>
> So will leaving my fields as unlimited varchar be a performance issue?
Or
> should I try to narrow them down?

In fact, there is a performance penalty for limiting their length,
because you have to check on each insert.

> My coworker has more experience with Oracle and MS-SQL than postgresql

You may want to tell your coworker to read the docs ;-)

A

--
----
Andrew Sullivan                         204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS                           Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew@libertyrms.info>                              M2P 2A8
                                         +1 416 646 3304 x110


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Sullivan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Datatypes and performance
Следующее
От: Andrew Sullivan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Datatypes and performance