Re: GIN data corruption bug(s) in 9.6devel

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tomas Vondra
Тема Re: GIN data corruption bug(s) in 9.6devel
Дата
Msg-id 563BFDBC.3010901@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: GIN data corruption bug(s) in 9.6devel  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: GIN data corruption bug(s) in 9.6devel
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 11/06/2015 01:05 AM, Jeff Janes wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Tomas Vondra
> <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
...
>>
>> I can do that - I see there are three patches in the two threads:
>>
>>    1) gin_pending_lwlock.patch (Jeff Janes)
>>    2) gin_pending_pagelock.patch (Jeff Janes)
>>    3) gin_alone_cleanup-2.patch (Teodor Sigaev)
>>
>> Should I test all of them? Or is (1) obsoleted by (2) for example?
>
> 1 is obsolete.  Either 2 or 3 should fix the bug, provided this is the
> bug you are seeing.  They have different performance side effects, but
> as far as fixing the bug they should be equivalent.

OK, I'll do testing with those two patches then, and I'll also note the 
performance difference (the data load was very stable). Of course, it's 
just one particular workload.

I'll post an update after the weekend.

regards

--
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SortSupport for UUID type
Следующее
От: Kouhei Kaigai
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: CustomScan support on readfuncs.c