Re: MERGE command for inheritance
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: MERGE command for inheritance |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5613.1281538993@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: MERGE command for inheritance (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: MERGE command for inheritance
Re: MERGE command for inheritance |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 13:25 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> I concur that Boxuan's suggested "difficult" approach seems like the
>> right one.
> Right, but you've completely ignored my proposal: lets do this in two
> pieces. Get what we have now ready to commit, then add support for
> partitioning later, as a second project.
Do we really think this is anywhere near committable now?
If it's committable in every other respect, I could see just having it
throw a NOT_IMPLEMENTED error when the target table has children.
I thought we were still a very long way from that though.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: