Re: Idea for improving buildfarm robustness
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Idea for improving buildfarm robustness |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 561037DF.9050705@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Idea for improving buildfarm robustness (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Idea for improving buildfarm robustness
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/02/2015 09:39 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > I wrote: >> Here's a rewritten patch that looks at postmaster.pid instead of >> pg_control. It should be effectively the same as the prior patch in terms >> of response to directory-removal cases, and it should also catch many >> overwrite cases. > > BTW, my thought at the moment is to wait till after next week's releases > to push this in. I think it's probably solid, but it doesn't seem like > it's worth taking the risk of pushing shortly before a wrap date. > > If anyone wants to argue for including it in the releases, speak up ... Wait, we're backpatching this? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: