Re: Materialized View or table?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jim Nasby
Тема Re: Materialized View or table?
Дата
Msg-id 55F7C92B.8070204@BlueTreble.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Materialized View or table?  (Johann Spies <johann.spies@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On 9/15/15 2:14 AM, Johann Spies wrote:
> What are the pro's and con's of large materialized views vs. tables in a
> case like this?

AFAIK a matview is essentially the same as a table under the covers, so
I don't believe there's any reason not to use one. At some point we'll
have incremental refresh of some sort, which might help in your case.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jim Nasby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgpass (in)flexibility
Следующее
От: Sylvain MARECHAL
Дата:
Сообщение: BDR truncate and replication sets