On 09/08/2015 09:54 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> On 09/05/2015 02:47 AM, Oskari Saarenmaa wrote:
>> There was a long thread about concatenating jsonb objects to each
>> other, but that discussion didn't touch concatenating other types.
>> Currently jsonb_concat always just returns the other argument if one
>> of arguments is considered empty. This causes surprising behavior
>> when concatenating scalar values to empty arrays:
>>
>> os=# select '[]'::jsonb || '1'::jsonb;
>> 1
>>
>> os=# select '[]'::jsonb || '[1]'::jsonb;
>> [1]
>>
>> os=# select '[]'::jsonb || '1'::jsonb || '2'::jsonb;
>> [1, 2]
>>
>> os=# select '0'::jsonb || '1'::jsonb;
>> [0, 1]
>>
>> os=# select '{"x": "y"}'::jsonb || '[1]'::jsonb;
>> [{"x": "y"}, 1]
>>
>> os=# select '{"x": "y"}'::jsonb || '1'::jsonb;
>> ERROR: invalid concatenation of jsonb objects
>>
>> Attached a patch to fix and test this. Also added a test case for
>> concatenating two scalar values which currently produces an array..
>> I'm not sure that behavior makes sense, but didn't want to change
>> that in this patch as I guess someone could consider that feature
>> useful.
>
>
>
> This looks correct. Barring objection I'll apply this shortly.
Actually, I'm not sure the test is sufficient here. It looks to me like
we should only be taking this fast path if one operand is an empty array
and the other is a non-scalar array.
Otherwise we get things like this (second case is wrong, I think):
andrew=# select '[]'::jsonb || '"a"'; ?column? ---------- ["a"]
andrew=# select '[]'::jsonb || '{"a":"b"}'; ?column? ------------ {"a": "b"}
andrew=# select '[1]'::jsonb || '{"a":"b"}'; ?column? ----------------- [1, {"a": "b"}]
cheers
andrew