Re: September 2015 Commitfest

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tomas Vondra
Тема Re: September 2015 Commitfest
Дата
Msg-id 55E8936D.5010003@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на September 2015 Commitfest  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 09/03/2015 03:06 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Two days ago the September Commitfest started. I'm going to be your
> host^W commitfest manager this time round.
>
> To start off I went through all entries and tried to make sure their
> state is accurate. Right now we have:
>
> Needs review:        47
> Waiting on Author:    24
> Ready for Committer:     7
> Committed:         7
> Rejected:         3
> Returned with Feedback:  3
> Total:                   91
>
> Of the open entries 41 currently have no assigned reviewer(s).

I've just noticed that we're not tracking the hashjoin alloc bugfix, 
which was reported back in June. Can you please add it to this CF? This 
is the last message in the thread:

http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/55E78322.10201@2ndquadrant.com

I've also noticed the 'multivariate stats' patch was returned with 
feedback (as agreed on 25/8), but it was not added to this CF. Maybe I 
missed something, but I assumed that happens automatically. I plan to 
submit a new version, reflecting the discussion. Can we add it?

BTW is there some place tracking these commitfest rules?

> My impression from the last commitfests and the current state of
> this fest is that several authors with, in some cases numerous or
> large, patches are not doing the corresponding amount of review on
> other patches. Let's change that!

Given the size of the multivariate stats patch, I guess I'm one of those 
slackers, Will fix.


regards

--
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Is this a bug?