Re: Proposal: backend "niceness" / session_priority

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andreas Karlsson
Тема Re: Proposal: backend "niceness" / session_priority
Дата
Msg-id 55BAA653.5050301@proxel.se
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Proposal: backend "niceness" / session_priority  (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On 07/31/2015 12:18 AM, Jim Nasby wrote:
>> This has been proposed before, and rejected before, and I'm not seeing
>> anything particularly new here.  Without a credible mechanism for
>> throttling I/O, "nice" alone does not seem very promising.
>
> Some OSes respect nice when it comes to IO scheduling, so it might still
> be useful.

Wouldn't the bgwriter remove a lot of the usefulness?

Andreas

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andreas Karlsson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Reload SSL certificates on SIGHUP
Следующее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Using quicksort and a merge step to significantly improve on tuplesort's single run "external sort"