Re: optimizing vacuum truncation scans

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jim Nasby
Тема Re: optimizing vacuum truncation scans
Дата
Msg-id 55B27FB3.30600@BlueTreble.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: optimizing vacuum truncation scans  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 7/22/15 11:11 AM, Jeff Janes wrote:
> I guess add an "Assert(InRecovery || running_a_vacuum);" to
> the visibilitymap_set with a comment there, except that I don't know how
> to implement running_a_vacuum so that it covers manual vacs as well as
> autovac.

static bool RunningVacuum; ? It only needs to be per-backend, right?

If it is that simple then my $0.02 is we should have the assert, not 
just a comment.
-- 
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jim Nasby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker.
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Proposal for CSN based snapshots