Re: UPSERT on partition
| От | Jim Nasby |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: UPSERT on partition |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 558DD39E.9020807@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: UPSERT on partition (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 6/24/15 1:03 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote: >> I think that the real way to fix this is, as you say, to make it so >> that it isn't necessary in general to write trigger functions like >> this to make inheritance work. > > Excuse me -- I mean to make *partitioning* work. It occurs to me that we could run the BEFORE triggers and then pass the new tuple to a user-supplied function that returns a regclass. That would allow us to know exactly which child/partition the UPSERT should be attempted in. -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: