Re: Further issues with jsonb semantics, documentation

On 06/12/2015 12:29 PM, I wrote:
>
>
>
> I agree that the json case looks a bit nasty. Maybe a better approach
> would be to provide a function that, given a JsonLexContext, returns
> the number of array elements of the current array. In get_array_start
> we could call that if the relevant path element is negative and adjust
> it accordingly.
>
>



Here's some code for the count piece of that.

cheers

andrew