On Mon, 2022-05-02 at 15:14 +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> Using a pg_ prefix
> makes them sound like actual useful tools though with (albeit small) risk for
> confusion? Noah's suggestion of libpq_ is perhaps better: libpq_testclient.
+1
I also like Justin's idea of only installing the test executables when
asked to explicitly, but I don't know enough about our existing MSVC
conventions to have a strong opinion there.
Thanks,
--Jacob