[Sorry for being late to the party, travelling does take away too much
time sometimes.]
On 19.05.2015 21:04, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> Bruno Harbulot asked for a devil's advocate by saying:
>> My main point was that this is not specific to JDBC. Considering that even
>> PostgreSQL's own ECPG is affected, the issue goes probably deeper than it
>> seems. I'm just not convinced that passing the problem onto connectors,
>> libraries and ultimately application developers is the right thing to do
>> here.
>
> Well, one could argue that it *is* their problem, as they should be using
> the standard Postgres way for placeholders, which is $1, $2, $3...
As Bruno already pointed out one could also argue that they just try to
accept what the standard asked them for.
I fail to see how such a way of arguing brings us closer to a solution,
though.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael.meskes at gmail dot com
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL