Rewriting backup.sgml (patch attached)
| От | Joshua D. Drake |
|---|---|
| Тема | Rewriting backup.sgml (patch attached) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 555BAB82.3080803@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответы |
Re: Rewriting backup.sgml (patch attached)
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello, Alright, per previous discussions I went through the backup.sgml page. I have gone thoroughly through: sql dump pg_dump pg_restore handling large databases I removed file based backups I didn't really touch the red headed step child that is pg_dumpall (although a word smithed it a little). I tried to remove some of the conversationalist tone. This is technical documentation not a story. I also removed as many extra words as reasonable and added specific examples. Now, I know some of you will say things like... why did you add -C to the pg_dump line. The reason is simple, without it as new person is going to get an error on restore. Our documentation should be explicit not implicit. I do not want to progress any farther on this until I get some feedback. Sincerely, JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you.
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: