Re: testing plpython3u on 9.0beta2

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>>> You could argue it either way.  The number of beta testers with
>>> plpython3 installations is probably very small, so I'm kinda leaning to
>>> just changing the code without a catversion bump.  OTOH, if we want to
>>> encourage testing of pg_upgrade ...
>> 
>> FWIW, the last bump has led to a lot of testing of pgupgrade.

> And fixes, that will appear in 9.0 beta3.  :-)  Most fixes were related
> to platform compile portability.

Well, if you think that pg_upgrade has changed materially since beta2,
that would be a good argument for getting some fresh testing for it,
which in turn argues for doing the catversion bump here.
        regards, tom lane