Re: multixacts woes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joshua D. Drake
Тема Re: multixacts woes
Дата
Msg-id 555111C2.7070207@commandprompt.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: multixacts woes  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 05/11/2015 10:24 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:

> In terms of adding a new GUC in 9.5: can't we take a stab at auto-tuning
> this instead of adding a new GUC?  We already have a bunch of freezing
> GUCs which fewer than 1% of our user base has any idea how to set.

That is a documentation problem not a user problem. Although I agree 
that yet another GUC for an obscure "feature" that should be internally 
intelligent is likely the wrong direction.

JD

-- 
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/  503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't
control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Disabling trust/ident authentication configure option
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Multi-xacts and our process problem