Re: Reorganization of spinlock defines

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Reorganization of spinlock defines
Дата
Msg-id 5551.1063334034@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Reorganization of spinlock defines  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Reorganization of spinlock defines  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: Reorganization of spinlock defines  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
Список pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> The problem with waiting for 7.5 is that we will have no error reporting
> when our non-spinlock code is being executed, and with Opteron/Itanium,
> it seems like a good time to get it working.

Well, as long as you're prepared to reduce the list of known supported
platforms to zero as of 7.4beta3, and issue a fresh call for port reports.

But it seems to me that this is mostly a cosmetic cleanup and therefore
not the kind of thing to be doing late in beta.  Couldn't we do
something that affects only Opteron/Itanium and doesn't take a chance
on breaking everything else?

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Reorganization of spinlock defines
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Reorganization of spinlock defines