Re: Query became very slow after 9.6 -> 10 upgrade

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Query became very slow after 9.6 -> 10 upgrade
Дата
Msg-id 5549.1511456440@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Query became very slow after 9.6 -> 10 upgrade  (Dmitry Shalashov <skaurus@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Query became very slow after 9.6 -> 10 upgrade  (Dmitry Shalashov <skaurus@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
Dmitry Shalashov <skaurus@gmail.com> writes:
> We tried to apply the patch on 10.1 source, but something is wrong it seems:
> patch -p1 < ../1.patch
> (Stripping trailing CRs from patch; use --binary to disable.)
> patching file src/backend/optimizer/plan/analyzejoins.c
> (Stripping trailing CRs from patch; use --binary to disable.)
> patching file src/backend/utils/adt/selfuncs.c
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 3270 (offset -91 lines).
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 3304 (offset -91 lines).
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 3313 (offset -91 lines).
> Hunk #4 succeeded at 3393 (offset -91 lines).
> patch unexpectedly ends in middle of line
> Hunk #5 succeeded at 3570 with fuzz 1 (offset -91 lines).

The line number offsets are expected when applying to v10, but it looks
like you failed to transfer the attachment cleanly ... there were
certainly not CRs in it when I mailed it.  The output on v10
should just look like

patching file src/backend/optimizer/plan/analyzejoins.c
patching file src/backend/utils/adt/selfuncs.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 3270 (offset -91 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 3304 (offset -91 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 3313 (offset -91 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 3393 (offset -91 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 3570 (offset -91 lines).
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dmitry Shalashov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Query became very slow after 9.6 -> 10 upgrade
Следующее
От: Mariel Cherkassky
Дата:
Сообщение: pgpool + repmgr - who should be responsible for failover