Re: unlogged tables

On 2015-04-13 17:49, Jeff Janes wrote:
>
> One way would be to lock dirty buffers from unlogged relations into
> shared_buffers (which hardly seems like a good thing) until the start of a
> "super-checkpoint" and then write them all out as fast as possible (which kind
> of defeats checkpoint_completion_target).  And then if the crash happened
> during a super-checkpoint, the data would still be inconsistent and need to be
> truncated.
>

What do you call a "super-checkpoint"?

--
http://yves.zioup.com
gpg: 4096R/32B0F416