On 4/9/2015 4:10 AM, Bill Moran wrote:
>> 1. Is 'bytea' column intended for storing text data?
> No, it's intended for storing binary data.
>
>> >2. Typically a chat can have text data with several special characters (which can be represented in multi
bytes),how these characters can be stored in a bytea column and retrieved back properly?
> bytea won't help you here. You'll have to manage the special
> characters entirely in your code. bytea gives you back the
> exact same types you put in, with no changes or interpretation.
>
> A better choice would be to use a text field with a proper
> text encoding (such as utf-8).
one possible rationale for using BYTEA is that the data could be in
various encodings, which the application wishes to preserve, and keeps
track of somewhere else (perhaps in a field within the XML?).
PostgreSQL text types would insist that all text be stored in the same
encoding, and anything in a different encoding would have to be
converted to the database encoding. Me, I'd be inclined to convert
everything to UTF8 and store it as such, and convert it back to the
user's encoding on display, but the feasibility of this really depends
on the use cases.
--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz