Re: "rejected" vs "returned with feedback" in new CF app

On 04/09/2015 09:09 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
>
>
>     "Moved" is really only applicable, I think, for cases where we punt a
>     patch to the next CF for lack of time.
>
>
> Well, that's basically what "returned with feedback" is now, so I 
> guess that one should just be renamed in that case. And we add a new 
> "returned with feedback" that closes out the patch and doesn't move it 
> anywhere. Which is pretty similar to the suggestion earlier in this 
> thread except it also swaps the two names.
>

I think we should keep it, and see how it works in practice. I'd prefer 
a name like "deferred" to "moved" - the latter is a workflow process 
rather than a patch status, ISTM.

cheers

andrew