Re: [JDBC] Support for JDBC setQueryTimeout, et al.

"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes:
> Robert Haas  wrote:
>> I thought we had decided on the client-side approach, but maybe
>> I'm confused. I don't have a position one way or the other, just
>> trying to understand the state of the conversation.

> Well, I've been pretty vocal on supporting a client-side solution,
> and Rados*aw clearly is in that camp, but that hardly makes a
> consensus.  David still has his patch out there, and Tom's comments
> seemed to imply that he supports a solution involving the
> statement_timeout GUC, so the question hardly seems settled.

No, no, I was trying to point out some reasons why depending on
statement_timeout would be problematic.  I'm all for doing this
client-side.

            regards, tom lane